
David Edward Hughes(1831-1900)
PROFESSOR D. E. HUGHES’S TELEPHONE, MICROPHONE, AND THERMOPILE.
THE
various branches of physical science are so inter-connected that any important
discovery in one branch is frequently the forerunner of a number of discoveries
not only in that particular direction, but in cognate branches. Such has been the case as regards the
researches and discoveries of Reiss, Gray,
As we proceed with this article we shall see
that the discovery of Professor Hughes has given Mr. Ellis a far more delicate
instrument than that of Professor Bell, and thus the investigation into the
laws of acoustics can be carried further.
Professor Hughes reasoned that as the electrical condition of substances
is affected by heat, and in some cases at least by light, and that heat and
light being undulating motions, therefore the electrical condition should be
affected by sound, sound being, as in the other cases, the production of
motion. To investigate this he “made a
rough-and-ready telephone, with a small bar magnet 4in. long, half the coil of
an electro-magnet, and a square piece of ferrotype iron, 3in. square, clamped
rigidly in front of one pole of the magnet between two pieces of board.” Professor Hughes is justified in calling
attention to what he terms rough-and-ready apparatus. Old match-boxes, money-boxes, empty cigar
boxes, and pieces of material that most philosophers would despise, have in his
hands been fashioned and manipulated to give astounding results.

His battery consists of three small tumblers- as shown
in Fig.1- containing a coil of copper at the bottom, on which is placed some
sulphate of copper, and then filled up with clay well moistened with
water. On the top is a small plate of
zinc. This battery, we are informed, has
been in use for three months, and works as well as ever. The internal resistance is of course
considerable, as is required. The
battery is connected with the telephone above-mentioned, and with the materials
upon which the experiment is made.
The first investigations of Professor Hughes will best
be explained in his own language:- “I introduced into the circuit at S (vide
Fig.1) a strained conductor- a stretched wire, listening attentively with the
telephone to detect any change that might occur when the wire was spoken to or
set into transverse vibrations by being plucked aside. Gradually, till the wire broke, the strain
was varied, but no effect whatever was remarked except at the moment when the
wire broke. The effect was but
momentary, but invariably at the moment of breaking a peculiar ‘rush’ or sound
was heard. I then sought to imitate the
condition of the wire at the moment of rupture by replacing the broken ends and
pressing them together with a constant and varying force by the application of
weights. It was found that if the broken
ends rested upon one another with a slight pressure of not more than one ounce
to the square inch on the joins, sounds were distinctly reproduced, although
the effects were very imperfect.” The
next act was to find means to produce the sound other than by the breaking of
the wire, and to find a substance or combination of substances which when
influenced by sound waves would transmit the sound to the telephone. The Professor found that if he filled a small
glass tube with a mixture of tin and zinc, known as “white bronze”, plugging
the ends with pieces of carbon, and connecting the whole as in Fig.2 with a
galvanometer in circuit, on slightly pressing the carbons, and thus compressing
the metallic particles, he obtained a deflection in one direction, whilst on
exerting a tensile strain on the glass, and thus slightly expanding the space
occupied by the metallic particles, he obtained a deflection in the other
direction. On compressing the metallic
particles they are brought into closer and better contact, and the total
resistance of the circuit is decreased, but on the contrary, when the particles
are farther apart the electrical contact is not so good and the resistance is
increased. Here then was the basis on
which to build.

The materials to be acted upon must be such
that the molecules would answer to the impingement of the sound wave, and thus
make an alteration in the resistance of the circuit. One of the transmitters devised by Professor
Hughes is shown in Fig.3, and is described by him as follows: “The tube transmitter consists of an exterior
glass tube two inches long, and one quarter of an inch in diameter. In it are four separate pieces of willow
charcoal, each one a quarter of an inch long, and two terminals of the same
material. The terminals are fastened in
the tube and connected externally with the line, and internally with the four
loose pieces. In this case A is made to
press on B, C, D, E, and F, until the resistance offered to the electrical
current is about one-third that of the line on which it is employed. It may be attached to a resonant board by the
ends A or F. If the result were simply
due to vibrations we should have A and B making greater contact at a different
time from E and F, and consequent interference.
If it were a simple shaking or moving of B, C, D, E, and F it would
produce no change, as, if B pressed more strongly on C, it would be less on A,
and also if the tube were attached by the center we should have no effect; but if the effect be due to a swelling or
enlargement of B, C, D, E, and F, it would make no difference where it is
attached to the resonant board, as is actually the case. Again, reduce the pressure of A upon B,
&c., until they are not in contact, and no trace of current can be
perceived by shaking the tube. The
instant the sonorous vibrations pass in the tube there is electrical contact to
a remarkable degree, which could only have taken place by the molecules
enlarging their sphere under the influence of the sonorous vibrations.”
As we have seen, sound is heard on the breaking of the
wire, and also on putting the ends together; but proceeding onwards, Professor
Hughes found that it was not necessary to join the ends of the wire. So long as good contact was made, little
difference occurred in the results. The
ends of the wires were connected to two French nails laid parallel on a board,
and contact made with a coin, a third nail, a piece of watch-spring, a piece of
chain; in fact, it can be made with any clean metallic surface – Fig.4.

Fine metallic filings introduced at the points of
contact greatly added to the perfection of the results. “At this point,” says Professor Hughes,
“articulate speech became clearly and distinctly reproduced, together with its timbre,
and I found that all that now remained was to discover the best material and
form to give to this arrangement its maximum effect. I tried all forms of pressure and modes of
contact; a lever, a spring, pressure in a glass tube sealed up while under the
influence of strain, so as to maintain the pressure constant. All gave similar and invariable results, but
the results varied with the material used.
All metals, however, could be made to produce identical results,
provided the division of the metal was small enough, and that the material does
not oxidize by contact with the air filtering through the mass.” The best material seems to be metallized
carbon. A piece of willow carbon heated
to a white heat and plunged under mercury becomes filled with mercury particles
in a minute state of subdivision, and what was previously almost a
non-conductor has now gained conducting properties. Carbon similarly metallized with iron gives
good results. Any of these preparations
provided with wires for insertion in the circuit is termed the
transmitter. The receiving instrument is
the telephone. As is well known, the
great objection to the telephone has been the weakness of the sound given
out. The Hughes transmitter commences a
new era in telephonic use. The theory
put forward by Professor Hughes is very ingenious. “It is quite evident that the effects are due
to a difference of pressure at the different points of contact, and that they
are dependent for the perfection of action upon the number of these points of
contact. Moreover, they are not
dependent upon any apparent difference in the bodies in contact, but the same
body, in a state of minute subdivision, is equally effective. Electrical resistance is a function of the
mass of the conductor, but sonorous conduction is a function of the molecules
of matter. How is it, therefore, that a
sonorous wave can so affect the mass of a conductor as to influence its
electrical resistance.” If we assume a
line of molecules at the point of contact of the minute masses of conducting
matter in their normal condition to be arranged as in the first group in Fig.5,
they will appear under compression as in the central group, and under dilation
as in the last.

Hence, in the one case, the resistance is less because
of the closer proximity of a larger number of points, and greater in the other
by reason of the increased distance between the points. If we look upon a molecule as a minute
substance constantly in motion, with an influence over a spherical portion of
space, vast in comparison to itself, and that the space over which this
influence is exerted is lessened or increased by the action of the sonorous
vibrations, we can easily see how the increased and decreased resistance would
occur without imagining change in the shape of the molecule.
In the ordinary telephone the sound wave is made to
impinge upon a diaphragm which causes magnetic changes in a permanent magnet,
and electrical changes in the coil surrounding the magnet, but Professor Hughes
dispenses with the diaphragm. You speak at
the French nails, or the tubes
prepared as above described, and the sonorous waves directly effect the
required result. The following
experiments can easily be made. Take a
prepared tube and fasten it on the top of an empty money box with one end taken
out, speak or sing into the box, and the sound is reproduced clear and distinct
on the receiving telephone – Bell’s.
Nay, you need not speak into the box, put the box to your ear, or your
forehead, or your foot if you like, and talk away – the sound is transmitted
all the same. Speak to the coin as in
Fig.4, and the sound traverses the circuit to the ear at the distant
telephone. But these extraordinary results
rapidly pale before others more wonderful still. The apparatus as shown in Fig.6, and which
has been termed a microphone, consists solely of a piece of metallized
carbon, balanced on a pivot and connected with one pole of the battery through
the telephone; this piece of carbon can rest on another piece of metallized
carbon connected with the other pole of the battery.

Sixpence and sixteen minutes’ attention would
enable any one to make this wonderful microphone. Speak to it a yard away and the sound is
conveyed with distinctness; touch the wood upon which it rests with the softest
camel’s hair brush and you have the sound of sawing wood at the receiving end;
touch with the holder of the brush and you hear the harsh grating sound as if
carpenters were sharpening their saws; take prisoner a common house fly,
incarcerate him in a match-box surrounded with gauze, and place the prisoner in
his prison-house near the microphone, and with ear at the telephone you hear
him tramp as he walks. This instrument
is destined to prove of the utmost importance in the hands of the physician. The noises in the chest, the beatings of the
heart, will all be laid bare with a distinctiveness never before known and
hardly ever conceived. Another form of
this instrument perhaps more delicate still is given in Fig.7.

This, indeed, seems to approach the confines of
perfection. You need not trouble to be
within a foot or a yard of the instrument.
It is a verbatim reporter. A
speaker might have a score or so of such reporters before him connected
electrically with the principal towns in the kingdom, and his words would be
repeated distinctly. The ordinary voice
if too near sounds harsh and disagreeable.
There is an old saying that “Walls have ears,” and it is now so far true
that double doors and walls cannot keep secret any conversation held
within. A singular fact about the whole
of these experiments is that the people at both ends of the line may be talking
or singing simultaneously, and the conversation or song is transmitted without
interference to the other end, but you do not hear your own speech or song at
your own telephone. Here then we can
have a duplex system without any special apparatus, and probably it will be
found that not only two, but many times two, messages are capable of being
transmitted at the same time.
A discovery, not made till after Professor Hughes’s
paper was read before the Royal Society, points out another field of usefulness
for this instrument. We all know what
excellent service the thermo-electric pile has done in the hands of Professor
Tyndall and other investigators of heat, but we think we may safely describe
another kind of thermo-pile as sensitive and far less complicated, less
difficult to construct, and less expensive than that compounded of zinc and
antimony in the usual fashion. Instead
of the glass tube as described in Fig.2, Professor Hughes was experimenting
with a quill tube, Fig.8, and found that the instrument was exceedingly
sensitive to heat.

On the approach of a warm hand the galvanometer
needle swings violently in one direction; on cooling the tube it swings the
other. We have seen Prof. Hughes place a
small French clock near the apparatus, and the motion of the clock generated
heat sufficient to cause the swinging of the needle, and on allowing the small
bell of the clock to strike, the needle swung violently as far as it would
go. We have said enough to show the
delicacy of all these instruments, but we must warn readers that these results
have been obtained not with materials manufactured in the best possible way,
but with materials taken from whatever source happened to be at hand, and put
together in the roughest manner. Prof.
Hughes has declined to patent his inventions, but gives them, with whatever
value they possess, to the world. The
world is deeply indebted to the discoverer for this noble act, and although
many will not realize the sacrifice he has made, those who trouble themselves
to think of the manifold uses to which the apparatus may at once be put, and of
the numberless benefits which may accrue from its introduction, will deal out
their praises with no niggard hand.
Back to Mike Penney’s "The
Sound of a Voice"