|
Vibert's
actual portrayal -- though the character is naturally in
keeping with Orczy's treatment of Robespierre as villian -- is incredibly
detailed and completely based in historical reality. By the end of
the second series, they'd beefed up his role, and there was a lot
more tension , darkness, and excitement as a result.
It is to his credit that he incorporates The Incorruptible's many noted
habits (e.g. the slight facial tic, nail-biting, and fist-clenching when
stressed; blinking when unnerved, but maintaining an unbroken stare when
talking to people; supreme and constant striving for control, but perfect
manners and decorum) without ever becoming merely a caricature. These
mannerisms
are used subtly and with a great sense of timing: a good example
of this can be found in the third (and
best) episodes of Series
One, where he briefly loses control in front of the
Committee members, and and Series
Two, where he collapses with physical and emotional
fatigue in the courtroom.
Vibert
has always been a strong vocal actor, and he captures Robespierre's high-register,
stressed, somewhat mechanical and strangely-emphasised speech pattern.
While his eye-colour must be an uncanny match for the historical Robespierre,
his face is not naturally broad enough, and for the Series 1, weight was
gained to accentuate the Chat-Tigre features of The Incorruptible.
Series 1's
bouffant wig is far too large, but it accentuates the Orczy dandy-dictator
stereotype well. A more realistic, small wig was used in Series 2.
The production of the Pimpernel
is superb: Series 1 cost approx. £5.4million, the script is witty
and action-packed, and a real effort has been made to balance Orczy
with little touches of historical accuracy. I've reviewed and detailed
each episode separately (links on left sidebar), but I'll leave an intro
quote for Martin Shaw (Chauvelin):
"To be honest, I didn't
find the book much help as far as research was concerned because I don't
think Baroness Orczy really cared very much. Not having read it, I thought
it would be like Les Miserables or Tale of Two Cities, but it's really
not in the same league, so we're very fortunate that Richard Carpenter
has done such a good job with the adaptation.
To be perfectly frank,
it's not a very good book. But the script is excellent".
And so is the series: completely
recommended.
This was the part that floored
me, driving me to a new obsession with the Revolution in general and Robespierre
in particular.
As such,
I've spent a fair bit of time on this part: so far, due to the onscreen
time and juiciness of the parts, I consider Lord Richard in The
Buccaneers and Robespierre to be the two key Vibertology
TV resources. As with all parts of Vibertology, any feedback or
comments hugely appreciated.
-
n. I've
gone into the serious historical parts of this (and other dramatic/fictional
treatments) in more detail on my Robespierre/French
Revolution site.
|
|