Main
Page
Links page
Masters
of
Choi Lee Fut
Chan
Heung
Chan Koon Pak
Jeong Yim
Chan
Yiu Chi
Tam
Sam
Ho
Hgau
Chui
Cheung
Chan
Hon Hung
Tse
Wing Bun
Lee
Koon Hung
Choi Lee Fut
Schools Directory
1. Africa
2. Asia
3. Australia
& South Pacific
4. Europe
5. Latin
America & Caribbean
6. North
America
Choi Lee Fut Articles
1. Choi
Lee Fut
Kung Fu
2. Chan
Heung`s
Ten Rules
3. The
White Crane of Choi Lee Fut
4. The Choi
Lee Fut Wooden Dummy
5.
No
Substitute For Skill
Links page
|
|
No Substitute For Skill?
by Sifu Dan Docherty
A lot of modern martial artists would
consider technical skill to be the most important quality. In America
some tournaments have now done away entirely with objective assessment
of skill such as awarding points for successful strikes or throws and
instead require the judges to rate each competitor as belonging to one
of five levels. For example someone rated as very advanced would receive
an "AA" rating of between 9.00 and 10.00 points, while someone
rated a beginner would receive a "C" rating of between 6.00
and 6.99 points.
I don't agree with this method of assessment. I have seen many fights
both in and outside the competition arena where the less technically
skilled fighter has won. This can be done by using superior tactics, or
by having greater endurance, or by possessing greater power or spirit. I
don't wish to discuss tactics much in this article. Instead let me
repeat an old saying about Chinese martial arts:- "Learning chuan
(i.e. any martial system) without learning Kung, even if you train until
you are old it is useless."
In other words it is quite possible to learn all the forms and fighting
techniques of a system and yet still be unable to defend yourself
effectively. So what is Kung?
Most experienced martial artists would agree that office workers
attending a 10 week self defence course are hardly capable thereby of
taking on bodyguard duties yet many police officers are patrolling the
streets and attending violent incidents with little more training than
this. And people wonder why there are so many assaults on police.
But let's not take the easiest case scenario. There are many myths in
the martial arts which people buy into when they join a martial arts
club. For example in karate there is the concept of "one block, one
punch" in response to an attack. Yet this is an ideal that most
black belt exponents would be hard put to aspire to. I fully accept that
a 10 stone bank clerk with a karate black belt from a reputable school
could usually beat other 10 stone bank clerks who have no training. It
is a big step from there to assume that our bank clerk could usually
beat a much larger and rougher gentleman who also was without formal
training.
When I first did Chinese full contact fighting, I was neither 10 stone
nor a bank clerk, although I did have a karate black belt. I quickly
learned that Kung or the acquisition of abilities through effort was of
the utmost importance.
Technique takes time to refine and improve, but power, endurance and
spirit can be built up in a much shorter period. This is evident from my
own experience. In 1976 when I represented Hong Kong in the 4th South
East Asian Chinese Full Contact Championships, in my first fight, I
received two black eyes, a bleeding nose, a cut lip and severe bruising
from the left hip down to the foot from Thai Boxing kicks and stamps.
When I won the open weight division in 1980 at the 5th South East Asian
Championships, I didn't have a mark on me. On the first occasion I
relied more on my kung training, while on the second occasion although I
did at least the same amount of kung training, the crucial difference
was in increased skill and tactical knowledge.
In Tai Chi Chuan we train Nei Kung or internal strength. This is a set
of 12 yin and 12 yang exercises. The yin exercises train the body to
withstand blows help to develop focused power and refine technique; the
yang exercises are more dynamic and are designed to increase muscular
strength. Apart from this we have other types of training which help to
condition the body and improve strength or stamina; we can call these
kung also in that they are also methods of acquiring ability through
effort.
So is it just a matter of going along to your local kung fu school to
learn their kung method? Unfortunately life is a little bit more
complicated than that. In Chinese martial arts there are two types of
students and two corresponding methods of teaching. In open classes all
students train together in most of the forms and techniques of the
particular system. However, there are also closed door classes for those
students who have gone through a formal ceremony to pay their respects
to the memory of the system's founder, to their teacher and to more
senior members of the school.
In Tai Chi Chuan Nei Kung is only taught to closed door students. When
my teacher first started teaching Tai Chi Chuan in the Hong Kong of the
1940s, he was 19 years of age. At that time there were many famous old
teachers resident in Hong Kong. He became successful not just because of
his knowledge and ability, but also because unlike the old masters, he
did not require students to wait six years before starting to show them
Nei Kung. I have adopted the same policy in the belief that although
advertising in Combat is essential (the cheque's in the post), the best
advertisement for any teacher is his students; for them to be an
effective advertisement it is necessary to give them kung training from
an early stage.
Some time ago some of my students were doing full contact training with
students from other Chinese styles. One young man who attended was hit
by a hand technique to the body by a Choi Li Fat stylist. He went down
and stayed down for a while. The young man took some time out to
recover. He then resumed sparring with a Tiger Crane stylist. He was
kicked to the body. He went down again. He took more time out. The young
man had a lot of guts, what he didn't have was kung. I hope he has
acquired some now.
Students of Choi Li Fat Sifu Edmund Ng from Newcastle attended the same
training session. I have never met Sifu Ng, but I was impressed by the
attitude and spirit of these young men. They were a credit to their
teacher. They could hit and they didn't complain when they were hit.
They had kung.
Rather than helping Chinese martial arts to prosper and survive, many
teachers, sometimes with the best of motives are emasculating them in
the same way that many teachers of Japanese and Korean martial arts have
emasculated their systems. In traditional karate schools in Okinawa,
training aids such as makiwara and chi'ishi are routine, yet there are
many "traditional" karateka who have never seen either let
alone used either.
I think it is important for martial artists to learn technique, but many
become mere technicians, knowing and teaching many different concepts,
able to talk intelligently about fighting, and showing techniques which
are effective in seminars only. Many technicians affect to despise full
contact fighting and make derogatory remarks while claiming that they
train "street-fighting techniques". Yet they do not consider
whether it would preferable to fight a highly skilled and fit opponent
in open competition or a beer-bellied lout in a back alley. In either
scenario my money would not be on the technician.
The fact is that kung training is tough, tiring and time consuming. It's
a lot easier to teach forms and techniques and let the students think
that they are doing real martial arts. A lot of martial arts teachers
don't know kung training, some know it but don't want to teach it,
either because it might cost them students or their students might be a
danger to them.
So ask yourself why you are training in the martial arts. Are you a
technician? Do you do enough kung training? Remember it is the best
substitute there is for skill.
Other
articles by Sifu Dan Docherty can be found on
the Practical Tai Chi Website
Top of page
|
|

Chan Heung Gong
The
Founder of
Choi Lee Fut

My Sifu, Edmund Ng

This
page contains my profile,
About Me
My Choi Lee Fut lineage
|