The Greenpeace Mystery
Relative to many of the Chemtrails websites, ChemtrailCampaigners is something of a newcomer. However, this actually places us in an admirable position inasmuch as we may be able to bring a fresh approach to the issue, and assess the many points that have been brought to the fore, untainted by preconceived notions and ideas.
Our initial encounter with the issue came about through a chance reading of a message posted to a Yahoo! eGroup that, by and large, had only a peripheral interest in the Chemtrails topic.
However, that was sufficient to prompt us to embark upon preliminary
research that essentially entailed studying in some depth the content of a whole
range of Chemtrails-related websites.
This was followed by correspondence with a number of Chemtrails activists, which brought other points to light.
As a result of these enquiries, and even before the ChemtrailCampaigners website was launched, we'd arrived at a number of conclusions:
1. Like so many issues of grave concern, Chemtrails appear to have attracted a "fringe element" who actually do little to assist a reasoned and balanced investigation. Consequently, padding out a vast body of solid facts and data is a lot of myth and nonsense, and speculations asserted as "fact" that, on close scrutiny, simply don't stand up.
2. That said, there does appear to be substantial and corroborated evidence that the "Chemtrails paranoia" is not completely without foundation. Going further, there appears to be sufficient evidence to warrant the strong suspicion that something untoward is occurring, and has been occurring for a number of years.
3. There also appears to be sufficient evidence to suggest that, whatever the Chemtrails activities may actually be, some sort of policy of obfuscation or straightforward denial is in place to prevent the public from developing an informed opinion.
This discovery automatically arouses even greater suspicion, and lends weight to the views of some of the less extreme "fringe element".4. Much of the available evidence points to a potentially toxic contaminating of the environment (to say nothing of the possibility of harmful effects upon the inhabitants of the environment — in other words, us) on a virtually global scale.
|
Given the foregoing, our immediate reaction was to assume that Greenpeace would already be involved in this issue, and therefore to speculate upon what their own investigations had unearthed, and what progress they had achieved.
Imagine our surprise when we learned that Greenpeace has not been
involved, is not involved, and seems not to have any intention of becoming involved!
This can be read in one of two ways. Either, in Greenpeace's opinion, there is
insufficient substance to the alleged Chemtrails activities to warrant their involvement;
or there is some other — possibly less honourable — reason for their
lack of involvement.
The first interpretation, in our opinion, simply doesn't carry any weight. There is sufficient material available, and sufficient evidence has been published, to warrant at the very minimum an in-depth investigation — even if that should subsequently establish that all the accepted interpretations of the evidence to date are in fact wrong.
It appears that Greenpeace's "explanation" for their non-involvement is that the Chemtrails activities are not a global environmental issue.
Even a cursory examination of the data will clearly establish that this is an absolute nonsense. If the Chemtrails activities are occurring as suspected, and in the form suspected, then they are very much a threat to the global environment, and arguably one of the most insidious threats we have yet encountered.
To make such a statement suggests very strongly that Greenpeace haven't even bothered to look at the evidence.
Inevitably, one must ask why. And the answer? Well, your guess is as good as ours. But generally, when confronted with such determined non-involvement on an issue as potentially serious as this, one can reasonably assume that pressure has been brought to bear somewhere, by someone. Either that, or a deal has been struck.
We would genuinely love to discover this is not the case, and we wait with bated breath to learn what the truth of their non-involvement is.
But if we juxtapose the suspected effects of Chemtrails activities with Greenpeace's own pronouncements on the current Earth Summit in Johannesburg, we're left with some very curious questions.
So, all you Greenpeace activists out there, how about lobbying Greenpeace to take the Chemtrails issue up as a matter of priority?
