SITEMAP 

PAGE UPDATED 17 JUNE 2007 

 | グル |  GURU  |  गुरु | གུརུ། | བླ་མ། |

 

! UPDATE ! AGENTS & TELEPATHS HAVE COME OUT !

 

GURUS DEMONS PHASE 3 AGENTS 1984 LINKS

 

BEWARE OF GURUS!


THIS IS A WARNING TO EVERYONE INTERESTED IN BUDDHISM!

A MONSTER GURU HAS TAKEN POSSESSION OF MY SOUL AND DESTROYED MY LIFE COMPLETELY.  

 

MY GURU, GEGEN KHYENTSE, DOES NOT PERMIT ME TO WORK AND FORCES ME TO BEG.

photo of monster guru lama gegen khyentse rinpoche in manali india<<< THIS SADISTIC MONSTER ENSLAVED ME AND HAS BEEN TERRORISING ME FOR 10 YEARS!

MY ONLY SOURCE OF INCOME ARE YOUR DONATIONS.

 

I AM HOMELESS, FRIENDLESS & LIFELESS:

DON’T LET THIS HAPPEN TO YOU !!

 

destroyed by a monster guru, mike became a homeless beggar

 

 

[Mike T., antigurus AT gmail.com ]

 

A Brief Introduction to

Guru Gegen Khyentse Rinpoche,

A Merciless Puppet-Master.

(Written by his victim and slave, Mike T.)

 

Below are photos of Gegen Khyentse  in Manali, India. He clearly does not look like a person you'd want to give your soul to, but he is a magician and can induce people to do anything.

 

photo of monster guru lama gegen khyentse rinpoche in manali india | グル | गुरु

photo of monster guru lama gegen khyentse rinpoche in manali india | グル | गुरु



This is a warning to all who may be contemplating getting involved with Buddhism!

 

I have been stupid and unfortunate enough to fall under the influence of a Tibetan Lama.


In 1997, having had studied Tibetan Buddhist texts for a few years, I felt I wanted to put my »knowledge« into practice, and decied to approach a high-level Lama, Gegen Khyentse , for guidance in Tantric practice (meditation).

 

According to Tibetan Buddhist texts it is imperative to GIVE one's Body, Speech, and Mind, to one's Guru in order to be able to achieve the desired results of meditation. In other words, I had become convinced that it was necessary to relinquish my body and soul and have them pass into the possession of this Guru to be able to receive his perfect guidance.

 

It took me less than a minute to utter the words with which I offered and gave my whole being to him, but it was a moment in time I have come to regret bitterly as it was the moment that defined my whole future and, effectively, ruined both my life and me as a man.

A few days later, he sealed my fate with the words to the effect of:”You can say goodbye to happiness in this life, now!” I was doomed.

 

Ever since that moment 10 years ago, when Guru Gegen Khyentse took possession of me and I lost all freedom and control over my life, I have been forced to exist in a state of crippling suffering and tortuous slavery, an existence of a zombie, not dead but not living either, and forever without a future.

 

The following are some excerpts from a text found on a Website dedicated to people who, like myself, have had extremely negative experiences with Tibetan Lamas, namely www.american-buddha.com. The text clearly portrays the unbelievable appetite for torture and abysmal cruelty of Tibetan Lamas in general, and Gegen Khyentse in particular.

 


This is G o o g l e's cache of
http://www.american-buddha.com/bulletin_board/about411.html
as retrieved on 13 Jun 2006 03:36:08 GMT.

 

[…]

Author

Message

AmLearning`
Veteran


Joined: 02 Jan 2004
Posts: 369

PostPosted: Sat Jan 03, 2004 4:03 pm    Post subject: bad memories


 

 

[…]
Thank you for having created this site and for others participating honestly here.


I have needed to discharge the painful burden of bad memories of the past and felt so alone with these bad memories because of the almost universal cultic idealising of Tibetans, the Dalai lama and anything Tibetan.

[…]

 

[…]

AmLearning`
Veteran


Joined: 02 Jan 2004
Posts: 369

PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2004 11:56 am    Post subject: tendencies to become a cult devotee


 

 

[…]

Quote:

Tara and I went to Castle Chillon on Lake Geneva this summer. That was depressing as hell. Seeing stone pillars that people were chained to. Observing that the festive hall was just a few floors above the miserable dungeon. Seeing that the offal from the privileged quarters fell outside the windows of the imprisoned, who had nothing but iron bars between them and the icy winds off the lake. Cruetly unimaginable -- I only wished. I could imagine it.


How moving it is for me to read your thoughts about Chateau Chillon. I know the place well, right there on Lac Leman, across the way from Montreux. I've also see other castles in Switzerland whose torture chamber was directly below the nursery and it sickened me to think of a childhood growing up hearing the screams echoing in stony rooms from people being tortured, ripped into pieces on the rack, being flailed, murdered by being closed into an Iron Mummy.

It was THAT Medieval mindset, that illiterate, isolated. magical thinking, terrified of the universe, monarchic hierachical political outlook that came with the Tibetans into India in 1959.


In Manali I asked Gegen Khyentse whether Tibet had jails and what their legal set-up was like. He said villagers usually took care of criminals in 'traditional ways'. In his village there was a woman who had poisoned somebody. The villagers strapped 'the poisoner' to a raft, put slivers of bamboo under her fingers with mini prayer flags attached so when they fluttered she screamed in pain and they set her down river, to let "fate decide her karma". Somehow he didn't think he was part of a lynch mob because they didn't actually kill her on the spot.



A stray cat in the Tibetan refugee settlement of Clement Town, where I lived for almost a year, stole a piece of dried meat from a Tibetan neighbor. He cut off the cat's ear with his knife because that was, in his understanding, karmically correct.

[…]
The Chateau Chillon mentality evolved in Europe over the centuries, it didn't in Tibet, which was still Medieval in 1959.

[…]

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Such aspects of Tibetan people, of Buddhism, and of Gegen Khyentse in particular, as described above were of course not known to me BACK THEN. My 'absorption' into Buddhism was very rapid owing to my fascination with its - admittedly - profound psychology and philosophy, and I only discovered the exteremely unpleasant facets of 'Guruism' when it was far too late for me.

I wish that 15 years ago there had been someone to tell me face-to-face just how dangerous a relationship with a guru can be!

Unfortunately, there was no such person - but I can at least do my duty now and act like that special 'someone' for potential future victims of gurus around the globe.


 

[THIS IS COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. REPRODUCTION IN ANY PUBLIC MEDIA BY PERMISSION ONLY!]






[THIS IS TO BE HANDED OUT WHILE BEGGING FOR MONEY ON THE STREET]

 

F.A.Q.

Some dreadful things you NEVER wanted to know about Buddhism and - Slovenia!

 

[THIS IS COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. REPRODUCTION IN ANY PUBLIC MEDIA BY PERMISSION ONLY!]

 

YOUR QUESTION: Why did you give me this to read rather than talking to me?

MY ANSWER:

1 My energy level is very low because the Guru sucks my power away: I am too exhausted to speak.
2 Furthermore, most »people« who ask me questions are not real humans, but AGENTS. An agent is a humanoid who is clairvoyant ( = able to read human minds) and also able to receive telepathic commands from a GURU. Guru Gegen Khyentse, who possesses me, has continually been using agents for more than 10 years now for the purpose of torturing me. Typically, whenever I'm begging, an agent would approach me and start speaking in a manner that is seemingly helpful, but is in actual fact calculated to make me fell even more depressed and desperate than before. Then, they suck the energy that was generated inside of me through negative emotions and feelings. Agents FEED on this kind of energy.

 

YOUR QUESTION: (You may be thinking:) »Is this man insane?«

MY ANSWER: Unfortunately, no. I have wished many times that I could become completely mad in order to escape my unbearable reality, but without success. I remain painfully sane.

The reason why you would like to believe me to be crazy is because of the following thought process in your (subconscious) mind:

 

1 »This man's story is either true or not true.«

2 »If it is true, the implications of what he is describing are horrifically scary - for the world, for us, for… ME!«

3 »Oh no, [insert an optional 'God' here], let this not be true! This can happen to ME! No, I do not want this to be true!«

4 »I am sure this man is insane, therefore his cognition is faulty and his story is untrue!«

5 »Phew, what a relief. I am safe now!«

 

It is understandable; This is how mind works. Unfortunately for you, my story is true, and I am not mad. I am merely a fool who has made a stupid mistake in his life and has reaped dreadful consequences. I am telling you this so that you can avoid making the same mistake.

You are never really safe, but with this knowledge you are safer. From now on, you will be wary and suspicious, and thereby safer.

 

YOUR QUESTION: How common are these »agents«?

MY ANSWER: Unfortunately, they are far more numerous than you would imagine!  Members of the elite, or anyone who is doing better (is more successful) in any manner, locality, or field of activity than the average person is a suspect, because the reason some »people« are successful is because they are clairvoyant. They abuse their ability to read minds to obtain people's private information (from their thoughts) and then take advantage of  this information in ways that enable them to become winners in society. The biggest problem is that with the knowledge of human thoughts and desires at any given moment they are able to make themselves outwardly congenial and friendly to people, while in fact they covertly try to ruin us and suck our energy. Agents are the wickedest and sliest sort of beings! Often, a person whom you consider very nice, or someone that you feel really »understands you deeply«, is in fact a covert agent. Terrible!

Matters are further complicated by the fact that some clairvoyant people may actually be real humans, and are not necessarily noxious. In my case, amongst the hundreds of clairvoyants who have at one point or another directly interfered with the course of my life,  less than 1% were “good”, all the rest were agents. I say “good” because even with these I am not quite certain as to what their true motives were.

 

Let me give you a specific example of a group of agents who live locally: Several top members of the Buddhist and Tibet Support Groups of Ljubljana, whom I know personally, are in fact agents. So mind your mind when they are in your vicinity!

 

Let me re-iterate that Agents operate in all parts of society. I have already identified 2 Agents among the homeless population of Ljubljana, who are pretending to be “helpless”. Why do they do that? Some agents are in fact “energy parasites”. They enjoy being in company with people who generate plenty of  negative energy through their suffering. (These vampires consider human misery and the ensuing energy fields very delicious and nutritious food.) Hence, the homeless population to them is an ideal habitat, because the average homeless person, being constantly immersed in bitter misery and hopelessness, and perennially on the verge of suicide, is a dense lump of bad energy craved by these monsters.

 

Rounding this section off, I remember an Agent I met in England: He was a retired nuclear scientist who had worked for the British Govt.  He firmly believed that dropping A-bombs (on Japan, or even  in general) was a good and correct thing. He had the air and general appearance of a kindly, good-natured grandfather.

 

YOUR QUESTION: Supposing that I am NOT an agent, can I help you in any way?

MY ANSWER:

1 If you were thinking to help me get a job – forget about it! For one thing, you'd probably incur trouble for yourself, for another, I've been offered – and have accepted - jobs in the past, only to find out that my employer was an agent! They used me for slave labour, or abused me in other ways. 

2 Overpowering the Guru is impossible. If you think it possible, please do not waste my time by sharing your precious hypotheses with me – keep them to yourself.

3 Therefore probably the only way you can help me is by giving me some money, or perhaps material things like shoes or a tent (I'm homeless…). It may be in your power to arrange access to a computer and printer for me, or perhaps help me translate (parts of ) this pamphlet into Slovenian!

Food, especially fruit, would be appreciated, because the food given to homeless people in Ljubljana is terrible – not enough to maintain one's health!

 

(You can also do something for homeless people in general by asking your Governement what it is doing to improve their situation.

I know the answer: VERY LITTLE! Imagine this: there are many people in Slovenia who receive no Social Security money at all; thus they are forced to beg and sleep outside, but when they do that the police come and FINE them!!! I mean, how wicked and cruel is that!!!) 

 

In times of war, natural disaster, or in some special circumstances, anyone can become a beggar, even you, who are now so proud and disdainful.)

 

YOUR QUESTION: Have you tried to seek refuge in Jesus Christ?

MY ANSWER:

1 If you are a Christian fanatic or bully (that is, if you think that Christ is superior to all other spiritual personages of the world, and that everyone should be converted to Christianity), please kindly go away and do not waste my time.

2 If you are a more sensible Christian, the answer to your question is YES, I have in the past asked Jesus Christ  for help, but he seems to be deaf, if he exists at all... Over the past 10 years I have tried every conceivable method to save myself, only to experience every possible let-down and disappointment.

 

ALSO!, please note that Jesus Christ is just as dangerous as any other guru (teacher), for which you can find concrete evidence in the Bible itself. Please help yourself to the leaflet entitled »How Jesus Deliberately Put Satan in the Heart of Judas«!

The bottom line is: Absolutely NO-ONE can be trusted.

 

I might at this point elaborate on why I have difficulty understanding  Christians. These “descendants of Torquemada” are given to conducting themselves in an over-bearing manner, and can become aggressive, too:

 

One day, while begging in front of the church in Presheren Sq., a stout, violent-looking man approached me and asked me something about my plackard, whereon there were some messages in large letters to the effect that "gurus are dangerous". He seemed peeved to see something non-Christian in front of a church. He didn’t make the effort to read the posters and hence completely misapprehended my purpose (which was, to inform Christians and non-Christians alike that gurus are dangerous) and thought that I was “advertising” Eastern religions!

He had introduced himself as a "protestant priest". I was not sure what exactly to make of this statement as he was wearing plain clothes, but I immediately recognised him to be a Christian hooligan, because of my previous acquaintance with them: it is impossible not to meet them during one's life for they are everywhere. Sometimes they wear a costume, sometimes plain clothes, but essentially a Christian hooligan is someone who will start forcing their fixed-ideas of how Christianity is superior to all other religions etc. upon anyone who gives them a minute of time. So I generally make a point of never giving such tedious proselytisers even 10 seconds of my time!

On this occasion, too, I tried to dodge this latest addition to my vast collection of unwanted acquaintances: He had, predictably, suggested that I should accept Jesus as the only Saviour, to which I immediately responded by saying that “Jesus might be even more dangerous than the gurus!” and drew his attention to a leaflet on the other side of the plackard, entitled: “How Jesus deliberately put Satan in Judas” in the hope that he would now be quiet for a while.

But alas! Yet again, without reading the leaflet properly, he flew into a rage and savagely tore my plackard into pieces. I only noticed this when it was too late as I had turned on my heel and walked a few metres away from him to beg from passers-by. Having walked back up to him, shaking my head in disbelief, I exchanged a few words with him to fully ascertain the extent of his irrationality. He informed me that if I continued my activity in that place he would come back and beat me up. (In the name of Christ, I presumed.)

 

To fully comprehend the import of this incident, you need to know that this leaflet contained a word-by-word citation from the Bible, alongwith a quotation from a book by Bernard Shaw clarifying that citation, and absolutely nothing of my own invention!

 

Well, with my plackard in tatters, there was no way of continuing begging that day. He hasn’t blessed me with his soothing spiritual presence since then. Perhaps, when he comes again and sees that I have now added a bit of bitterly sarcastic text of my own invention to the leaflet, he shall graciously condescend, in his holy fury, to put me out of my misery by cutting my throat or something!

 

YOUR QUESTION: Actually, where are you from?

MY ANSWER:  I am from hell.

Hell is non-geographical. Please also understand that the events of my life do not, essentially, in any way depend on my geographical movements. One needn't travel to the Himalayas in order to get into this sort of trouble, it can all happen within the confines of a single town.  Though it is true that the particularly powerful Gurus such as Gegen Khyentse are concentrated in that part of the world, please remember that generally, Gurus and their Agents, (and humans as their potential victims and prey), are everywhere!

 

YOUR QUESTION: How much money do you get from people per day when begging?

MY ANSWER: On average,  not more than 2000SIT. Disastrous. Slovenians are the stingiest people I have come accross. I would not be surprised to discover that they are the most miserly people in the world. Having begged for alms in Asian countries like Tibet, Nepal and India, where alms-begging is an accepted cultural norm, and everyone who is relatively well-off gives to those less fortunate, and having experienced people there giving me money in heaps, it was quite shocking for me to return to Europe and see how completely different European people are in this respect. It was daunting enough to observe, say, Spaniards or Britishers ignore me completely when begging in places like promenades and parks and only very RELUCTANTLY, stinginess contorting their faces in an ugly way, give me money only after a Sunday mass in front of a church, but at least they made decent contributions on those occasions. But to have to taste the miserliness of Slovenians has been downright nauseating.

One of the most disappointing experiences was to see how short-fisted the church-goers, i.e. the Christian people, of Ljubljana are – and we are talking about the Xmas season here, the 24&25th DEC, in the heart of Ljubljana! And these folks are supposed to be the followers of the most famous beggar in human history. I am certain if Jesus visited Ljubljana he would be left to starve to death.

After the holidays I am going to beg in places where students concentrate because they are the sort of people who are most susceptible to Gurus’ seduction. Students are intellectually advanced and curious, yet lacking in wisdom and experience, and as such very vulnerable, so they need to be warned. I hope they will show more sense than the general populace or the Christians.

 

Stinginess, or lack of generosity, is a major defect in a human being, a sign of ignorance and bad character. A person who practices GIVING shows that he or she (at least subconsciously) understands the inter-connectedness of all beings in the world, and proves that he or she has compassion, whereas a person who is stingy and unwilling to give even a morsel of food to a stranger is clearly without mercy. Uncompassionate, cruel persons are backward, evolutionally inferior, and ugly. Thus, in terms of generosity, Slovenians are inferior to many other nations because they are small-minded and lacking in magnanimity.

 

Let me mention at this stage that there are other indications that Slovenians do not intend to evolve: the way they relate to their language, for example.  When I visited this country a few years ago, I made the effort to learn a few phrases in the Slovenian language. Then I noticed 2 astonishing things:

1) The common colloquial language (spoken “on the street”) is vastly different from the Standard Slovenian (spoken e.g. on national TV). Hence, learning  Slovenian is like learning two disparate languages!

2) There are virtually no people who consistently speak the Standard Slovenian! Outside of the National Radio and TV virtually everyone, even professors and authors, speak Slovenian as if they were dimwits who had dropped out of school at the age of 10!

I found this situation repulsive, and firmly decided never to bother with this language again. If Slovenians do not make an effort to cultivate their language, why should foreigners? (Many people here speak English anyway, and, luckily for me, they are taught the BBC variety at most schools.)

 

There are many factors that determine the quality of a people's nationhood: the quality of their language is one of them. Moreover, paying attention to how one speaks and making a conscious effort to improve one's diction by setting high standards for it has a strong bearing on one's thought processes and is indispensable for mental evolution.

 

YOUR QUESTION: I have seen you selling “Kralji Ulice”, the Slovenian equivalent of the “Big Issue”, a homeless people's magazine. What is your experience with that?

MY ANSWER:  First and foremost, do not think even for a second that this is a “job”. This is done by people who are desperate and have no choice. It is demeaning, humiliating and denigrating. It is particularly difficult for somewhat “special” people like me: If I didn't have a monster-guru crushing me down I could be a translator (of Tibetan, Japanese, and English), a rich international businessman, etc.etc., so highly-unspecialised work like this (that can be done by anyone who can stand on their 2 feet) is frustratingly unfulfilling and downright soul-killing for me.

 

Secondly, the selling of this magazine to me is  actually only an alternative method of disseminating

the information about the Guru-danger. I insert a sheet of paper into each copy of the mag. directing  readers to a Website about “LEARNING TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM SPIRITUAL TERRORISM.”

 

Thirdly, this activity, like many others that I engage in in my lethally boring vegetative state (in order to elicit at least some “life”), is an amateur psychological experiment. I try to see how people respond in different extreme situations. It is true that there is a certain portion of the populace who have some sympathy for the homeless, and they even exert the effort of putting it into practice, but they seem to prefer to show this by buying the homeless' magazine, rather than giving money to those who are “just” begging. It is also true that some buyers give us more than the actual price of the magazine.

While such conduct is laudable, it is a far cry from true generosity. Such persons are willing to part with money, they are even willing to give more than is required, but they expect and insist on getting something in return. This “ something for  something” type of generosity is only a first step in the development of the soul, while the ultimate stage is the true generosity of the “ something for nothing”  variety. This means that you GIVE an item wholeheartedly, preferably to someone who you feel does NOT DESERVE it at all, you say goodbye FOREVER to the item you are giving away, and do not expect ANY REWARD OR GRATITUDE!

 

Such generosity is practiced by many people in Asia, and I have tried it myself (back in the days when I still had a life and some money to give.) If you wish to experience it,  find the person (in your local park, perhaps?) whom you consider to be the laziest, the least deserving, and having the worst character of all people you know, and give him 5000SIT or more without being even asked.

Shakespeare put it in a nutshell:

Hamlet: ... Use [=treat] every man after his desert, and who should [e]scape whipping? Use [=treat] them after your own honour and dignity. The less they deserve, the more merit is in your bounty.

 

A very important point to understand here is that such acts of giving are primarily meant to help you, the ugly miser, to improve your soul; the benefit of the person you've given to is of secondary importance here. It also goes without saying that giving to people indiscriminately all the time would ruin them (Give a man a fish...); the goal is to develop the intention to help; once such a desire is engendered in your mind, the next step is to learn to give wisely and effectively (Teach a man how to catch fish and give him a net...).

 

It is clear that wherever there is at least one homeless person there is evidently a lack of CARE on the part of the general populace.

It is no good to think that “the government should take care of these problems”! The governments accross the globe are nothing but expressions or manifestations of their respective peoples. Bad people have  bad governments. The government will do only what the people FORCE IT TO DO.  And since a people is a collection of individuals, i.e. persons like YOURSELF, the only way to improve the people, the government, and ultimately the situation of the underprivileged, is by improving YOU!

 

Now, how do we set about improving YOU?

By CARING. I usually sell the homeless' magazine on Chopova Street. In the evenings I often see an old woman combing through the rubbish-cans for things that may be of some use, even food. She takes her time, so hundreds of people pass her by during the process. I love-hate to observe these passers-by as they keenly absorb the scene for a few seconds... they all understand perfectly what they see, but it's only a few seconds... the moment she is behind their backs, they kick her out of their minds. She's gone. Erased.

She is not the only one. There are many. (You may be pleased to hear that there are some nations crueler than Slovenia where the number of homeless reduced to feeding out of rubbish-containers is in the 100,000's. But lets focus on Slovenia now.)  Nor is this old woman your average junkie, you know. She wears traditional farmers' clothes, is neither a drug-user, nor an alcoholic, nor a criminal nor... So it is difficult to dismiss her with the standard: “Ah-hah, she's on the street, digging dirt, ei? Well, I'm sure it 's her own fault!” And yet you do! You dismiss her from your thoughts, from your life, from your CARE.

 

Take, on the other hand,  your average junkie. It's so easy and convenient, isn't it, to sweep them under the carpet with a nonchalant “Well, I'm sure it's their own fault!” But is it???

Yes, insofar as it was their own decision to take that first sniff, that first injection, and then again and again.

But, NO, inasmuch as it was an emotional vacuity and a disturbed mental state caused primarily, in most cases, BY THEIR STUPID PARENTS, that tricked them into naively seeking refuge and warmth and fulfilment in narcotics! The causes of most human failures can be traced directly to parents, who in most cases were uncaring, emotionally disturbed half-wits that  should never have been allowed to have offspring to begin with, or, in the case of orphans, to a lack of proper parents.

 

Note that "care" is cognate with Latin caritas and possibly also with Sanskrit karuna, both roughly translating as “love”. You do not care at all so you can't even begin to love; and vice versa, you have no true love so you cannot care?!?

 

Most ordinary people have absolutely no notion, leave alone experience, of what it is like to be homeless. This is hardly surprising, given that they even do not  want to think about it.

Without delving into an analysis of all aspects of this state of existence, let me expound only the most important fact to be apprehended:

Homelessness, as contextually defined in this pamphlet and as experienced by most homeless people, IS NOT A VOLUNTARY CHOICE!

“Normal” people, in their blissful ignorance, often attribute some philosophical or spiritual significance to Homelessness (misplaced comparisons with Indian SADHUS and the like are often to be encountered). They sometimes see in the homeless way of life something romantic (confusing it with the VOLUNTARY way of life of a free-spirited BOHEMIAN). Some may even nostalgically relate to an archetypal nomad buried in their subconscious (again forgetting that nomads are drifters BY CHOICE.)

Please! Attaching fancy epithets such as “Kings of the Road” to the homeless only masks the profound misery and complete IMPOTENCY of these creatures of the road, while failing to improve their situation in any way.

 Comparisons with free, wandering philosophers such as Sadhus are utter non-sense! Your typical Sadhu is a mature person who has had a normal childhood and married life, who has, in short, experinced most of the sorrows and JOYS that can befall a man, and is in many ways CONTENT. This is what empowers him to WILLINGLY RENOUNCE the lifestyle of a settled house-holder and search of a deeper truth through the lifestyle of a house-less ascetic.

Last but not least, do not forget that Sadhus are still loved by those they left behind, and may return to them at any time.

How vastly different this is from the REAL homeless people!!!

Homelessness is one of the most unpleasant and distressing states of existence. It is a symptom and a result of not being loved or desired by anyone, in fact, of having devaluated to the level of a piece of shit, if you'll excuse my language. (When even simple plants have been shown to require love and to whither when not wanted by anyone, what need is there to say that human beings, being far more complex, require someone to care for them in order to maintain a motivation to remain alive and functioning?)

 

The fall usually begins, as stated above, with an absence of a caring family environment, which, in turn, causes the individuals in question to become unable to psychologically attract care and to show care in their later lives. A vicious cycle of not being cared for by others and, as a reaction, caring less and less for others, is created, and eventually culminates in lonely homelessness. But mark! What very few people understand is that such a vicious cycle needs to be broken as soon as possible by those who have the means to do so – the privileged - lest it become a powerful whirl sucking in more and more people.

(Last but not least, if you are one of those unreasonable couples planning to have a baby, withold your bold erection and dam your vaginal juices for a minute to ponder on this: Are you not yourself one of those uncaring, emotionally disturbed half-wits that  should never be allowed to have offspring in the first place? Are you not going to produce a new human being only to neglect him or her emotionally, turn him into yet another homeless junkie, and eventually blame it on him or her?)

 

Now, supposing that you are considering to improve the situation, how should you set about it?

One of the preliminary steps is undoubtedly to take a very close look at your current attitudes and conduct and confess that they are completely inadequate:

You “kindly” give the homeless the kind of food that only swines could live on (In Ljubljana, one is lucky if one gets more than 1 piece of fruit per month!!!) and consider this an angelic act! You pack six people at a time into tiny little containers where there is hardly any space to move, like caged chickens, and you expect to be praised as highly humane and socialistic! You condescend to part with your money to buy their magazine now and then, and you think yourselves mighty generous! Etc.etc. What rot!!! 

 

So much MORE needs to be done. Proceeding logically from what has been said about dysfunctional families and the psychology of the homeless, you will realise that the first major step towards an improvement is, of course, to try to actually CARE.  Through the power of care one is them impelled to engage in concrete action and aid. VERY CONCRETE ACTION.

 

You have to show  in MATERIAL terms that you care and love, for one thing because you are only human and as such (to be quite frank) only capable of a contrived, FAKE love , and for another because the average homeless person has no practical knowledge of or acumen for such emotions, real or fake! 

Your heart may be overflowing with care but the homeless cannot tune into that particular frequency, I'm afraid. Your face may be beaming with love but the rejected creatures of the road cannot perceive it, they have a blind spot. And, needless to say, they are MATERIAL beings and as such require  MATERIAL goods.

But it is no good to provide half-hearted assistance which sends a message to the homeless that they are a lot of scumbags and worse than pigs. Until your assistance reaches a level where every single homeless person is alloted a long-term private room, offered decent food at least vaguely in accordance with the advertising campaigns by Health Ministry (“fruits and (raw) vegetables 5 times a day...”),  and effectively steered towards REAL jobs, there will be no overall improvement of the situation, and this will remain a VILE society.  You need to comprehend that you need to  provide REAL material aid in order to PROVE to the deprived that you have TRUE good intentions. Once the homeless have perceived your continued care through material goods, they will gradually awaken from the torpor of their hopelessness, learn to respond by caring for you, and eventually to care for themselves, their bodies, souls, and future.

 

(Compared with my predicament, eternal enslavement by a merciless guru, the tasks discussed above are actually very easy, since you are free people!)

 

Let us turn again to people who receive no Social Security money at all - they are forced to beg and sleep outside, but when they do that the police come and FINE them! (You got that right – it's like the land belongs to a wicked landlord who treats his tennants like rats!) What kind of message is the society as a whole sending to these people?

Let me spell it out for you, if you daren't confess it: The  message is: “FUCK OFF AND DIE, YOU LOOSER!

That's right. You heard me right! The society, that is, YOU and your mean friends and relatives etc., are telling these poor people that you do not want them around and that they should commit suicide.

(If you think I'm exaggerating, just wait for your turn to become homeless, and you'll hear the message VERY CLEARLY then.)

 

I have read in an English language newspaper that the Government is concerned about the falling birth-rate in Slovenia and introducing measures to encourage people to produce more babies. In the light of the foregoing, this news surprises me. Isn't it a bit contradictory? On the one hand the Government (or is it YOU?) wants people to commit suicide, on the other, it expects them to live and multiply.

???

Oh, right, yes, I see it now... how stupid of me! The idea is, of course,  to raise the birth-rate to such a high level that even if you kill off the loosers that (bloody rats!) may inadvertently get born in the process, you'll still have plenty of winners to populate this green and pleasant land. Right.

 

Frankly speaking, I think it would be better for Slovenians as an ethnic group to die out, and that for 2 reasons:

1)  There is little doubt that Slovenianness (i.e. the state or condition of being Slovenian), is intrinsically awkward, unpleasant, and painful.  Slovenians are uncomfortable with themselves (alcoholism, suicides, depression...), just as they are uncomfortable with foreign nations (severe xenophobia - owing to bad experiences throughout history?) Hence, by becoming extinct you would eliminate Slovenianness and with that the suffering festering on it.

2)  The other reason derives from the afore-mentioned miserliness and the associated lack of magnanimity.  Through inter-marriage with other, more magnanimous ethnic groups, Slovenians would gradually disappear and their assimilated descendants, by way of developing “greater souls” , would undoubtedly be happier people!

 

Apart from inter-marriage there are other ways of erasing a people. If you believe in reincarnation, it is easy to see that although bodies and the genetic material contained therein can indeed be destroyed and discontinued, souls can not – if the type of body they had been accustomed to is no longer available, they find a different. Thus, if all Slovenian men underwent vasectomy all of a sudden, the genetic line would be broken, but the souls would continue to exist and proceed to find a – hopefully – brighter, happier future in bodies of a different genetic set-up.

 

On a more subtle level, though, there is another way of removing the pain of  Slovenianness. If one analyses carefully, one finds that “ Slovenianness “, just like so many other things whose validity and warrantedness we never question, is merely a very complex mental concept that arises in one's mind due to prolonged conditioning.

From the moment one is born the verbal bombardment with notions of “Slovenian this, Slovenian that, blah-blah-blah”  begins and goes on relentlessly, until one is successfully brainwashed into believing that one is – a Slovenian! But pause! What if your soul had incarnated only a few hundreds kilometres away in , say, Hungary or Austria? What then?

 

You can see that your “ethnicity” is illusional; an unnecessary and even harmful part of your ego-structure which you'd be better off without. It should be clear that despite the existence of very concrete phenomena that serve as a basis for attaching the label “Slovenian” (such as the “Slovenian” land, language, and genes)..., it is possible to stop being Slovenian by seeing through all the conditioning and brainwashing you had been subjected to and thereby dispelling these harmful hallucinations.

Thus, there is a way of becoming extinct without going extinct!

 

I hope I'm making my point clear: Be it one way or another, It is in Slovenians' own best interest to become extinct, unless they are willing to change – radically.

A radical change would primarily have to comprise a vast change in attitudes... evolving from a mere “Dolina Shentflorianska” to the condition of a “provincial country” that Slovenia is now; advancing then, through intensified  interaction with FOREIGNERS, to a state of greater Cosmopolitanism, and eventually, in preparation for the age of space-travel, Universalism.

 

YOUR QUESTION:  Don't you think that all this Slovenia-bashing is counter-productive in terms of your primary “mission”? I mean, if you insult people they are less likely to pay attention to your warnings regarding gurus because they will be too preoccupied with their hurt.

MY ANSWER: I may be bashing a bit, but definitely not trying to insult anyone. Though my negative experiences here have been, to a great extent, personal, I am trying to interperet them in an impersonal manner and give an objective critique that may help some people to broaden their outlook and mentality. I do not purport to be an expert or authority on these issues, but when you hear of eminent Slovenian thinkers such as TARAS KERMAUNER “retreat behind the tall walls of a lone house in the country because he physically cannot stand the sight of (his own) people, you know that something is rotten here and a change is required. (http://www.mladina.si/tednik/200523/clanek/slo-intervju--svetlana_va