|
ECPR SG Organised Crime | ||
| May 2002 |
eNewsletter OC |
The Next Issue: |
| 30 September |
| Special Issue: Falcone and Borsellino | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Memories
of Falcone and Borsellino
Antonio
Ingroia Sostituto Procuratore presso la
Procura della Repubblica di Palermo.
Exactly ten years
ago, on May 23, 1992, an awful explosion shook the motorway which goes to
Palermo airport, killing the man who was the symbol of the Antimafia fight,
Giovanni Falcone, his wife and his body guards. Less than two months later, on
July 19, 1992, a car bomb destroyed an entire building of the city centre,
killing Paolo Borsellino and his escort and tearing apart, at the same time,
all hope that the Italians may have had of being able to fight the mafia.
Nobody could have
guessed, during those terrible hours, that, in the years which followed, the
most impressive results of the recent history of the anti-mafia fight would be
achieved: the arrest of Toto Riina who had been in hiding for decades and of so
many other bosses who operated freely in the zone; the identification and
condemnation of the executors and instigators of those two and other massacres
committed during the tragic years of 1992-93; the confession of so many
mafiosi; the reconquest of the territory by the state, thanks to the united
efforts of the police and the army; the effective application of sentences for
mafiosi who were no longer treated as "bosses" in prison but
effectively "isolated" from their associates still at large. In
short, within a few years, the state recuperated in the eyes of honest citizens
the credibility that it had lost after so many years of laxism, inertia,
complaisance and cover-ups; years in which the mafia had become a real
"power", capable of elaborating strategies to infiltrate the political,
economic, financial and, in the end, the institutional spheres.
The sacrifices of
Falcone and Borsellino were the price to pay, as they provoked in the nation a
burst of anger which in turn led to the collective commitment by society and
its institutions to fight the mafia, thus marking the beginning of an era of
hope and victories. But even this new
era which seemed different and where mistakes of the past were taken on board,
came to grief in the end. After too short a cycle of four years, during which
the strong determination of everyone brought many successes in the fight
against the mafia, came years of indifference, with retrograde steps and lack
of enthusiasm. The mafia took a lower
profile and the fight against it became less and less virulent, as if it had
lost all its importance and appeal.
These were years during which the mafia was lying low and licking its
wounds, giving almost the impression that, after the blows it had received, it
was finally defeated; whilst, on the opposite side, the magistrates and
policemen were finding themselves more and more isolated, less and less
protected, exactly like Falcone and Borsellino must have found themselves.
To talk or write
about Falcone and Borsellino has never been easy. But it has become even more
difficult in the present atmosphere of general indifference. Yet for someone as
myself who has been so closely associated with them, it is a heartfelt duty to
do so. Teachers, mentors and friends they have been for many Palermitan
magistrates, but for me, they were more, if this is possible: I learnt the
rudiments of my job as an investigative magistrate working at their side,
listening and treasuring their advice. This is why I find words totally
inadequate.
I remember with
nostalgia the days when, as a young trainee, full of curiosity and anxiety, I
approached Falcone who was already (in 1987) one of the most prestigious
magistrates in Italy. I shall never forget either the cordiality with which
Borsellino welcomed me when I was appointed to his Procura (Public Prosecutor's
Office) in Marsala, a man of great simplicity who immediately won me over and
suscitated in me, like in all his colleagues and young magistrates who worked
with him, the greatest enthusiasm. In a matter of months, he succeeded to
infuse in me the same passion for justice and deep dislike for all forms of
abuse of power which had helped him to transform Marsala in the eyes of the
nation into a point of reference, a model for the anti-mafia fight.
We were inspired by
the lessons of Borsellino and Falcone but we also modelled ourselves on their
ways of being, above all on their relentless determination to arrive at the
truth even when (and this happened often in their careers) their moral stance
had created around them, in the cushy court rooms, diffidence, envy, malicious
gossip and permanent isolation.
But their real
revolutionary contribution was of a methodological nature: the innovative
methods which they introduced in their investigations into the mafia. They were
the first to investigate bank accounts, trying to reconstruct the financial
activities of the mafia and the movements of 'dirty' money; they were also the
first to use the organisational model of the 'pool', i.e. a homogeneous group
of magistrates each in charge of a specific task and aware of the risks
involved. They were the first to understand, adapting their work accordingly,
that Cosa Nostra was above all a criminal organisation which had to be analysed
and fought as such.
Falcone and Borsellino
were not only extraordinary teachers but they also gave us great lessons in
living. Great childhood friends - they had grown up together in a popular
district of Palermo - they both loved their city intensely and their
relationship was based not only on high professional respect for each other but
also on a sincere friendship in which there was no space for personal
rivalries. They were in fact essentially complementary: Giovanni Falcone was
the 'strategic mind' of the pool and Paolo Borsellino its 'organising mind'.
Paolo Borsellino had
a rare gift for story-telling and a great sense of humour; he loved to recount
endless anecdotes drawn from his rich professional experience which helped us
to understand how difficult but important, it is to create a good rapport with
the mafiosi you are interrogating. He was extremely modest and never liked to
'lecture'. His teaching came spontaneously from his personal experience, not
from books or theories. The Paolo Borsellino whom I accompanied during the last
months of his life, after the loss of his friend Giovanni Falcone, was a
changed man: all of a sudden he felt tired and weary but in a great hurry to do
his work, as if driven by the premonition of his own death.
If after the Capaci
bombing, he managed to keep the investigations going, after his own murder, we
were all tempted to give up, particularly those of us who had been very close
to him and Falcone. If we managed to overcome this feeling and continue, with
our own limitations, the work they had not had the time to complete, it was
because of two things. First, the rage that all the Italians felt, asking
forcefully the state to honour the sacrifices which Falcone and Borsellino had
made, by renewing its commitment to the Antimafia fight, thus succeeding in
provoking an unprecedented return to legality. But the determining elements for
us were, in the last analysis, the heritage they had left us, their ethical
position and their last words which explained that their own commitment had
followed the murder by the mafia of one of their own colleagues-friend. So, for
those who had been closely associated with Giovanni and Paolo, it is a duty to
testify, to keep their memory alive by continuing their work. Moreover, in
these recent years of public disinterest, it seems as if a great desire to
forget prevails helped by the passing of time (which apparently is a good
healer) and the temptation of indifference returns while the mafia reorganises
and grows strong again. This is why today, ten years after the tragedy, it is
more important than ever, for the future of democracy in Italy to keep alive
the memory of past events and of great men.
Paolo Borsellino and
Giovanni Falcone did not like rhetorical speeches. What was much more important
for them, was that each of us in our everyday lives should take action. This is
why every opportunity of commemorating them, as we are doing today, must be
transformed, lest it should be useless, into an opportunity for action: to
'resist', especially in hard times, but above all to act. This is what Falcone
and Borsellino would have tried to do in the difficult times in which we are
living.
|
Last Updated: 20 May 2002
Contact: oceditor@lycos.co.uk